Analysis complete.
marisol_2026030311475430 (1).pdf
Submission #3 · 1 page(s) · 105.5 KB · Uploaded Mar 13, 2026 at 15:30 · ARS YUNEN · Auth: Y2614355799499
Glosa Risk Assessment
HIGH RISKHIGH RISK. Significant issues found. Only proceed with substantial discount (>15%) and if issues can be resolved.
Risk Factors Detected
| Factor | Category | Severity | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prescription Missing | administrative | high | Medical prescription is missing. |
Overall Audit Result
Confidence: 95.0%
Financial amounts reconcile perfectly, demonstrating a clear breakdown of ARS coverage (70%), patient copay (30%), and the retail price difference passed to the patient. However, the required medical prescription is missing, which poses a high risk of a Glosa Administrativa.
Amounts Extracted
ITBIS Reconciliation
Audit Checks
| Check | Status | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| RNC Validation | pass |
RNC 132125509 is present and has a valid 9-digit format.
Show reasoningExtracted RNC 132125509 from the pharmacy stamp and ARS section. It meets the DGII 9-digit requirement for corporate taxpayers.
|
| NCF Validation | pass |
NCF B0201358889 is present and valid.
Show reasoningThe receipt lists NCF: 00000000B0201358889. Stripping the leading padding zeros yields B0201358889, which is a valid 11-character format for a 'Factura para Consumidor Final' (B02 prefix).
|
| Date Verification | pass |
All dates are 31/01/2026, which is prior to the audit date of 2026-03-13.
Show reasoningThe ARS authorization date is '31 de Enero del 2026' and the receipt date is '31/01/2026'. Both match and are valid past dates.
|
| Amounts, Copay & ITBIS Reconciliation | pass |
Amounts reconcile perfectly through a standard 70/30 ARS coverage split and a retail price difference.
Show reasoningStep A: Voucher shows Total=696.00, Copay=208.80, ARS Covers=487.20. Receipt shows Total=740.00, Efectivo (Patient pays)=252.80, Crédito (ARS)=487.20, ITBIS=112.88. Step B: Receipt internal math is consistent (Base 627.12 + 18% ITBIS 112.88 = 740.00). Step C & D: The ARS authorized a tariff of 696.00. The ARS covers exactly 70% of this tariff (696.00 * 0.70 = 487.20). The standard copay is 30% (696.00 * 0.30 = 208.80). The pharmacy's retail price is 740.00. The pharmacy bills the ARS for the covered 487.20 and charges the patient the remainder (740.00 - 487.20 = 252.80). This patient charge (252.80) exactly equals the ARS copay (208.80) plus the difference between the retail price and the ARS tariff (740.00 - 696.00 = 44.00). Step E: The math is perfectly consistent with standard DR pharmacy billing practices.
|
| Provider Information | pass |
Provider name, address, and phone are present.
Show reasoningHeader clearly shows 'FARMA OLE SRL', 'AV. MONUMENTAL #92', and 'TEL.:(809)883-0507'.
|
| Signatures and Stamps | pass |
Patient signature and pharmacy stamp are present.
Show reasoningThe document contains the official stamp of 'FARMA OLE, S.R.L.' and is signed by the patient 'Marisol Valdez' over the stamp.
|
| Prescription Validity | fail |
Medical prescription is missing.
Show reasoningOnly the pharmacy receipt and ARS voucher are provided. Decreto 665-12 requires the original medical prescription with diagnosis, exequatur, and physician signature for reimbursement.
|
| Cross-document Consistency | pass |
Patient identity and dates match across the voucher and receipt sections.
Show reasoningPatient 'MARISOL VALDEZ' and Cedula '11000067238' are consistent. The authorization number Y2614355799499 is clearly linked.
|
Warnings
- Missing medical prescription (receta médica). This is a critical requirement for ARS reimbursement.
Missing Elements
- Medical prescription (receta médica)
Identified Documents (1)
Pharmacy invoice and insurance receipt from Farma Ole for Marisol Valdez
Financial amounts reconcile perfectly, with the pharmacy charging the patient a 44.00 DOP difference above the authorized copay. However, the required medical prescription (receta médica) is missing, which is a critical requirement for ARS reimbursement.
Checks (7)
- RNC Validation [pass]: RNC 132125509 is present and valid.
- NCF Validation [pass]: NCF B0201358889 is present and valid.
- Date Consistency [warning]: Invoice date is 31/01/2026. Valid, but potentially expired for submission.
- Amounts, Copay & ITBIS Reconciliation [warning]: Math reconciles perfectly, but reveals a 'copago indebido' of 44.00 DOP.
- Provider Information [pass]: Provider name, address, and phone are present.
- Signatures and Stamps [pass]: Required signatures and stamps are present.
- Prescription Validity [fail]: Medical prescription is missing.
Layout Features (6)
| Page | Feature | Confidence | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | rubber stamp | 95.0% | Circular blue rubber stamp on the left receipt, partially overlapping handwritten text. |
| 0 | rubber stamp | 95.0% | Circular blue rubber stamp on the right receipt, partially overlapping handwritten text. |
| 0 | signature handwritten | 90.0% | Handwritten signature on the left receipt, below the 'Firma del Afiliado' line. |
| 0 | handwriting | 90.0% | Handwritten text 'Marisol Valdez' on the left receipt, above the signature line. |
| 0 | handwriting | 90.0% | Handwritten text 'Marisol Valdez' on the right receipt, above the 'TOTAL ITBIS PAGADO' line. |
| 0 | barcode | 95.0% | Barcode at the bottom of the right receipt. |
Analysis Steps — Debug Log (4 steps)
| Worker | Step | Status | Duration | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| page_decomposer | document_decomposition | completed | 10596 ms | Found 1 document(s) |
Raw Output
|
||||
| full_analyzer | full_document_analysis | completed | 50417 ms | Verdict: needs_review | Glosa risk: high (40.0%) |
Raw Output
|
||||
| page_decomposer | document_audit_5 | completed | 64545 ms | Verdict: needs_review |
Raw Output
|
||||
| layout_analyzer | layout_analysis_doc_5 | completed | 5993 ms | Found 6 feature(s) across 1 page(s) |
Raw Output
|
||||