Analysis complete.

Glosa Risk Assessment

LOW RISK
0.0% Max discount: 0.0%

LOW RISK. Documentation appears compliant. Standard discount acceptable.

No risk factors triggered. Documentation appears compliant.

Overall Audit Result

APPROVED

Confidence: 99.0%

Excellent claim documentation. Financial amounts reconcile perfectly with no ITBIS discrepancies. The medical prescription is valid, properly stamped, and matches the dispensed medications. ARS authorization is present and valid.

Amounts Extracted

Voucher Total 1396.54
Voucher Copay 418.96
Receipt Subtotal 1396.54
Receipt Itbis 0.0
Receipt Total 1396.54
Receipt Cash 418.96

ITBIS Reconciliation

Totals: Reconciled Copay: Reconciled
The receipt total and voucher total match exactly (1396.54). The patient payment and voucher copay match exactly (418.96). Medications are exempt from ITBIS in the DR, which is correctly reflected by the 'E' next to the line items and the 0.00 ITBIS total. No complex ITBIS reconciliation is required.

Audit Checks

CheckStatusDetail
RNC Validation pass RNC 132125509 is present and has the valid 9-digit format.
Show reasoning
Extracted RNC 132125509 from the FARMA OLE header. Counted 9 digits, which is the standard format for corporate taxpayers in the DR.
NCF Validation pass NCF B0201356293 is present and valid.
Show reasoning
Extracted NCF B0201356293 from the receipt. The 'B02' prefix correctly identifies it as a 'Factura para Consumidor Final' (Consumer Invoice) and is followed by the correct number of digits.
Date Verification pass All dates are consistent and prior to 2026-03-13.
Show reasoning
Prescription date is 2026-01-09. Dispensation/Invoice date is 2026-01-13. Both are before the audit date of 2026-03-13. The dispensation occurred 4 days after the prescription, well within the 15-day legal limit set by Decreto 665-12.
Amounts, Copay & ITBIS Reconciliation pass Receipt and voucher amounts match exactly. No ITBIS applied.
Show reasoning
Step A: Extracted from receipt -> Subtotal: 1396.54, ITBIS: 0.00, Total: 1396.54, Patient Paid (Tarjeta): 418.96, Insurance Paid (Otros 1): 977.58. Extracted from voucher -> Total Reclamado: 1396.54, Seguro Cubre: 977.58, Pago Afiliado: 418.96. Step B: Receipt items (832.00 + 564.54) sum exactly to 1396.54. Step C: Voucher total (1396.54) exactly matches receipt total (1396.54). Voucher copay (418.96) exactly matches receipt patient payment (418.96). Step D: ITBIS is 0.00, which is correct as medications are marked 'E' (Exento) on the receipt. Step E: Perfect reconciliation.
Provider Information pass Provider info is complete and consistent.
Show reasoning
FARMA OLE SRL, Av. Monumental #92, Tel: (809)883-0507 are clearly printed on the header.
Signatures & Stamps pass All required signatures and stamps are present.
Show reasoning
Patient signature ('Maria Ysa') is on the voucher. Pharmacy stamp is present on the voucher. Prescribing doctor's stamp and signature are present on the prescription.
Prescription Validity pass Prescription meets all Decreto 665-12 requirements.
Show reasoning
Prescription includes doctor's name (Dr. Cesar Beras), specialty (Cardiologo), Exequatur (2389), patient name (Maria Ysa), date (9/1/2026), and clear medication instructions (Betauno 2.5, Coralat 81mg, uso continuo).
Cross-document Consistency pass Patient and medication details match across all pages.
Show reasoning
Patient name 'Maria Ysa' on prescription matches 'MARIA MAGDALENA YSA' on the voucher. Medications 'Betauno 2.5' and 'Coralat 81mg' on the prescription exactly match the items billed on the receipt and authorized on the voucher.

Identified Documents (2)

Invoice Pages 0–0

Pharmacy invoice and insurance authorization receipt from Farma Ole

needs_review Confidence: 95.0%

Financial amounts and identification details match perfectly between the receipt and the authorization voucher. However, the required medical prescription (receta médica) is missing, which poses a high risk of administrative rejection (glosa) by the ARS.

Checks (8)
  • RNC Validation [pass]: RNC 132125509 is present and valid.
  • NCF Validation [warning]: NCF B0201356293 is validly formatted but is for 'Consumidor Final' (B02).
  • Date Verification [pass]: All dates are 2026-01-13, which is prior to the audit date of 2026-03-13.
  • Amounts, Copay & ITBIS Reconciliation [pass]: All amounts reconcile perfectly without ITBIS.
  • Provider Information [pass]: Provider info is present and consistent.
  • Signatures and Stamps [pass]: Required signatures and stamps are present.
  • Prescription Validity [fail]: Medical prescription (receta médica) is missing.
  • Cross-document Consistency [pass]: Patient and authorization details match perfectly.
Layout Features (6)
Page Feature Confidence Description
0 rubber stamp 95.0% Circular rubber stamp with text 'FARMA OLE' and 'RNC: 132125509' on the left side.
0 rubber stamp 95.0% Circular rubber stamp with text 'FARMA OLE' and 'RNC: 132125509' on the right side.
0 signature handwritten 98.0% Handwritten signature above 'FIRMA CLIENTE' on the left side.
0 signature handwritten 98.0% Handwritten signature above 'Firma del Afiliado' on the right side.
0 barcode 99.0% Barcode located near the bottom left corner.
0 handwriting 90.0% Handwritten number '3' near the top left corner.
Prescription Pages 1–1

Medical prescription for Betauno and Coralat from Asociación Dominicana de Cardiología

incomplete Confidence: 95.0%

The submission consists solely of a medical prescription. It lacks the required fiscal invoice (NCF) and insurance authorization voucher necessary for factoring. Furthermore, the prescription itself is non-compliant with Decreto 665-12 due to missing patient identification (Cedula/NSS), missing diagnosis, and an incomplete date.

Checks (8)
  • RNC (Registro Nacional de Contribuyentes) [pass]: RNC 4-30-12216-5 found on the institutional stamp.
  • NCF (Número de Comprobante Fiscal) [fail]: No fiscal invoice provided.
  • Dates [fail]: Incomplete date on prescription.
  • Amounts, copay & ITBIS reconciliation [not_applicable]: No financial documents provided.
  • Provider info [pass]: Provider information is clearly printed in the header.
  • Signatures & stamps [pass]: Doctor's signature, doctor's stamp, and institutional stamp are present.
  • Prescription validity [fail]: Missing patient Cedula/NSS, missing diagnosis, and incomplete date.
  • Cross-document consistency [not_applicable]: Only one document submitted.
Layout Features (7)
Page Feature Confidence Description
1 rubber stamp 95.0% Circular blue rubber stamp on the left side, partially overlapping handwriting.
1 rubber stamp 90.0% Rectangular blue rubber stamp on the right side, containing doctor's name and specialty.
1 signature handwritten 98.0% Handwritten signature located above the 'FIRMA' line.
1 letterhead 99.0% Printed letterhead at the top with the organization's name, address, and contact information.
1 logo 99.0% Logo of the organization in the top left corner within the letterhead.
1 form layout 95.0% Pre-printed form layout with fields for 'NOMBRE', 'FECHA', and 'FIRMA' at the bottom.
1 handwriting 99.0% Extensive handwritten text detailing the prescription, patient name, and date.
Analysis Steps — Debug Log (6 steps)
Worker Step Status Duration Summary
page_decomposer document_decomposition completed 10528 ms Found 2 document(s)
Raw Output
[{"type": "invoice", "page_start": 0, "page_end": 0, "description": "Pharmacy invoice and insurance authorization receipt from Farma Ole"}, {"type": "prescription", "page_start": 1, "page_end": 1, "description": "Medical prescription for Betauno and Coralat from Asociación Dominicana de Cardiología"}]
full_analyzer full_document_analysis completed 46282 ms Verdict: approved | Glosa risk: low (0.0%)
Raw Output
{"verdict": "approved", "confidence": 0.99, "summary": "Excellent claim documentation. Financial amounts reconcile perfectly with no ITBIS discrepancies. The medical prescription is valid, properly stamped, and matches the dispensed medications. ARS authorization is present and valid.", "checks": [{"name": "RNC Validation", "status": "pass", "detail": "RNC 132125509 is present and has the valid 9-digit format.", "reasoning": "Extracted RNC 132125509 from the FARMA OLE header. Counted 9 digits, which is the standard format for corporate taxpayers in the DR."}, {"name": "NCF Validation", "status": "pass", "detail": "NCF B0201356293 is present and valid.", "reasoning": "Extracted NCF B0201356293 from the receipt. The 'B02' prefix correctly identifies it as a 'Factura para Consumidor Final' (Consumer Invoice) and is followed by the correct number of digits."}, {"name": "Date Verification", "status": "pass", "detail": "All dates are consistent and prior to 2026-03-13.", "reasoning": "Prescription date is 2026-01-09. Dispensation/Invoice date is 2026-01-13. Both are before the audit date of 2026-03-13. The dispensation occurred 4 days after the prescription, well within the 15-day legal limit set by Decreto 665-12."}, {"name": "Amounts, Copay & ITBIS Reconciliation", "status": "pass", "detail": "Receipt and voucher amounts match exactly. No ITBIS applied.", "reasoning": "Step A: Extracted from receipt -> Subtotal: 1396.54, ITBIS: 0.00, Total: 1396.54, Patient Paid (Tarjeta): 418.96, Insurance Paid (Otros 1): 977.58. Extracted from voucher -> Total Reclamado: 1396.54, Seguro Cubre: 977.58, Pago Afiliado: 418.96. Step B: Receipt items (832.00 + 564.54) sum exactly to 1396.54. Step C: Voucher total (1396.54) exactly matches receipt total (1396.54). Voucher copay (418.96) exactly matches receipt patient payment (418.96). Step D: ITBIS is 0.00, which is correct as medications are marked 'E' (Exento) on the receipt. Step E: Perfect reconciliation."}, {"name": "Provider Informat
page_decomposer document_audit_3 completed 52517 ms Verdict: needs_review
Raw Output
{"verdict": "needs_review", "confidence": 0.95, "summary": "Financial amounts and identification details match perfectly between the receipt and the authorization voucher. However, the required medical prescription (receta médica) is missing, which poses a high risk of administrative rejection (glosa) by the ARS.", "checks": [{"name": "RNC Validation", "status": "pass", "detail": "RNC 132125509 is present and valid.", "reasoning": "Extracted RNC 132125509 from the header. It is exactly 9 digits, which is the standard format for corporate taxpayers in the Dominican Republic."}, {"name": "NCF Validation", "status": "warning", "detail": "NCF B0201356293 is validly formatted but is for 'Consumidor Final' (B02).", "reasoning": "The NCF is listed as 00000000B0201356293 (padded). B0201356293 is a valid 11-character format. However, B02 is 'Factura para Consumidor Final'. ARS typically require 'Factura de Crédito Fiscal' (B01) to deduct the expense. This might be acceptable if the pharmacy submits a consolidated B01 invoice to the ARS later, but stands as a documentation warning."}, {"name": "Date Verification", "status": "pass", "detail": "All dates are 2026-01-13, which is prior to the audit date of 2026-03-13.", "reasoning": "Receipt date is 13/01/2026. Voucher date is 13 de Enero del 2026. Both match and are strictly before the current date (2026-03-13)."}, {"name": "Amounts, Copay & ITBIS Reconciliation", "status": "pass", "detail": "All amounts reconcile perfectly without ITBIS.", "reasoning": "Step A: Extracted amounts. Receipt: Subtotal=1,396.54, ITBIS=0.00, Total=1,396.54, Tarjeta (Copay)=418.96, Crédito (Seguro)=977.58. Voucher: Monto Reclamado=1,396.54, Pago afiliado=418.96, Seguro Cubre=977.58. Step B: Internal consistency. Receipt items (832.00 + 564.54) = 1,396.54. Subtotal + ITBIS = 1,396.54. Voucher items copay (249.60 + 169.36) = 418.96. Voucher items coverage (582.40 + 395.18) = 977.58. Step C: Cross-document. Receipt Total (1,396.54) = Voucher Total (1,39
page_decomposer document_audit_4 completed 37390 ms Verdict: incomplete
Raw Output
{"verdict": "incomplete", "confidence": 0.95, "summary": "The submission consists solely of a medical prescription. It lacks the required fiscal invoice (NCF) and insurance authorization voucher necessary for factoring. Furthermore, the prescription itself is non-compliant with Decreto 665-12 due to missing patient identification (Cedula/NSS), missing diagnosis, and an incomplete date.", "checks": [{"name": "RNC (Registro Nacional de Contribuyentes)", "status": "pass", "detail": "RNC 4-30-12216-5 found on the institutional stamp.", "reasoning": "Extracted RNC 4-30-12216-5 from the blue stamp of 'ASOCIACION INSTITUTO DOMINICANO DE CARDIOLOGIA INC.'. Removing hyphens gives 430122165, which is a valid 9-digit format."}, {"name": "NCF (Número de Comprobante Fiscal)", "status": "fail", "detail": "No fiscal invoice provided.", "reasoning": "The document is only a medical prescription. No invoice with an NCF was included in the submission, which is mandatory for reimbursement and factoring."}, {"name": "Dates", "status": "fail", "detail": "Incomplete date on prescription.", "reasoning": "The date field at the bottom reads '9 / / 2026'. The month is missing, making the date invalid and unverifiable against the 2026-03-13 threshold or the 15-day dispensation window."}, {"name": "Amounts, copay & ITBIS reconciliation", "status": "not_applicable", "detail": "No financial documents provided.", "reasoning": "Cannot perform financial reconciliation because no invoice or authorization voucher with monetary amounts was submitted."}, {"name": "Provider info", "status": "pass", "detail": "Provider information is clearly printed in the header.", "reasoning": "Header contains 'ASOCIACIÓN DOMINICANA DE CARDIOLOGÍA (I.D.C.) INC.', address, phone (809 566 2219), and email. This meets the identification requirements for the prescribing institution."}, {"name": "Signatures & stamps", "status": "pass", "detail": "Doctor's signature, doctor's stamp, and institutional stamp are present.", "rea
layout_analyzer layout_analysis_doc_4 completed 8051 ms Found 7 feature(s) across 1 page(s)
Raw Output
[{"feature_type": "rubber_stamp", "confidence": 0.95, "description": "Circular blue rubber stamp on the left side, partially overlapping handwriting."}, {"feature_type": "rubber_stamp", "confidence": 0.9, "description": "Rectangular blue rubber stamp on the right side, containing doctor's name and specialty."}, {"feature_type": "signature_handwritten", "confidence": 0.98, "description": "Handwritten signature located above the 'FIRMA' line."}, {"feature_type": "letterhead", "confidence": 0.99, "description": "Printed letterhead at the top with the organization's name, address, and contact information."}, {"feature_type": "logo", "confidence": 0.99, "description": "Logo of the organization in the top left corner within the letterhead."}, {"feature_type": "form_layout", "confidence": 0.95, "description": "Pre-printed form layout with fields for 'NOMBRE', 'FECHA', and 'FIRMA' at the bottom."}, {"feature_type": "handwriting", "confidence": 0.99, "description": "Extensive handwritten text detailing the prescription, patient name, and date."}]
layout_analyzer layout_analysis_doc_3 completed 8826 ms Found 6 feature(s) across 1 page(s)
Raw Output
[{"feature_type": "rubber_stamp", "confidence": 0.95, "description": "Circular rubber stamp with text 'FARMA OLE' and 'RNC: 132125509' on the left side."}, {"feature_type": "rubber_stamp", "confidence": 0.95, "description": "Circular rubber stamp with text 'FARMA OLE' and 'RNC: 132125509' on the right side."}, {"feature_type": "signature_handwritten", "confidence": 0.98, "description": "Handwritten signature above 'FIRMA CLIENTE' on the left side."}, {"feature_type": "signature_handwritten", "confidence": 0.98, "description": "Handwritten signature above 'Firma del Afiliado' on the right side."}, {"feature_type": "barcode", "confidence": 0.99, "description": "Barcode located near the bottom left corner."}, {"feature_type": "handwriting", "confidence": 0.9, "description": "Handwritten number '3' near the top left corner."}]